DC to Reboot Fictional Universe Simultaneous With Digital Download Scheme

The announcement from DC's official blog The Source on Tuesday conveniently mentioned only oblique things about the line-wide story reboot that will accompany the beginning of their same-day-digital-release plan. (A thank you to my buddy TJ (@StrsMyDestntion) for putting me on to this at all.) In fact, most of their promo material is skirting the issue.

DC has really put the fear of god (or God, whichever you prefer) into both its retailers and its fans with this double news. Same-day-digital release is risky. But restarting a series' numbering from 1 of a new volume always peeves some. Retooling ongoing stories with little warning downright angers people. Starting in August every single damn DC Comics character, property, and title will be available same-day-digital and gets a story re-boot with their new volumes. Or so it seems. The statements that have people concerned are those from DC The Source:

"the first issue of JUSTICE LEAGUE by Johns and Lee... will offer a contemporary take on the origin of the comic book industry’s premier superhero team."

and this one from DC co-publisher Dan DiDio in the big USA Today article:

"We really want to inject new life in our characters and line ... This was a chance to start, not at the beginning, but at a point where our characters are younger and the stories are being told for today's audience."

However, no other statements I've seen clearly make claim to a resetting of any narratives. Not even, as far as I can tell, this list of a few of the new titles with creator line-ups and quick 'new directions' descriptions from The Source. I'm an optimist: intentional misdirection to get fans angry and talking? Probably not. That's what I thought about Marvel's "Spider-Man: One More Day" (another attempt to 'refresh through reboot' the Spider-Man story) and I was dead wrong. The idea is to make the characters feel new again by disregarding the complicated stuff that's come before. Sounds great but smells very, very fishy to those of us who follow the industry's shake-ups of the past two decades. We've heard these things before, you see. It rarely goes well. I could show you proof:

Google "joe quesada spider-man one more day" or "crisis on infinite earths zero hour" or "grant morrison batman rip final crisis return" or "rob liefeld heroes reborn" or "john byrne spider-man chapter one". Some people liked these stories (and they have elements to recommend them), but they all have in common a deus ex machina, nonorganic, magic approach to storytelling. An approach that was inevitably again and again rolled-back.

That said? Totally HAS worked out on occasion. "Crisis on Infinite Earths" was more successful then not for a long time. Green Arrow being brought back from the dead. "Spider-Man: Revelations" narrowly solved more problems than it created. Regardless. As I wrote a few weeks ago, the stunt writing needs to stop. Just because you've done something shocking doesn't mean you've done something good.

Some of the smartest commentary I've seen on his issue has come from comics-artist and Hypothetical Island studio (@HypotheticIsle) member Reilly Brown. His Twitter stream (@Reilly_Brown) in real-time after the announcement read:

Reilly_Brown

Reboot is the opposite of new, and the opposite of progression.

1 Jun

...

Reilly_Brown

Wouldn't it be wild if PROGRESSING the story made sales go up and they didn't even have to reboot it in the end?

31 May

Reilly_Brown

If they're going to reboot it all anyway, why not?

31 May

Reilly_Brown

...Let's give Superman a kid! Let's kill Batman and leave him dead! Let's have Nightwing and Starfire get hitched!"

31 May

Reilly_Brown

... let's make some bold moves and take the characters to new places with their lives, do some things we wouldn't be able to take back...

31 May

Reilly_Brown

Next time, before they reboot a whole comics universe, they should say, "hang on a sec, since we know we're going to start over anyway...

31 May

One statement that should have people excited is this one, also from DiDio in this ancillary USA Today interview:

"It's not just about straight superhero characters and stories. We're going to use war comics, we have stories set in mystery and horror, we've got Westerns."

Variety is a good thing.

The image below is being asociated with the news. It has been confirmed by The Source in a note from DC's Co-Publishers to be the cover of the new "Justice League" #1 (and to have been penciled by Jim Lee (@jimlee) and inked by his oft-art-partner Scott Williams, with colors by long-time DC colorist Alex Sinclair). As of Thursday June 2 at about 5 PM a Google Image search for: " "DC comics" reboot " brings it up first. And fourth and fifth and eighth and tenth and fifteenth and seventeenth and eighteenth...

And the sources for this image and other related ones? Most are comics-centric but mixed in are various sites that cover a variety of news, some with a dedicated section for comics, some without, including: MTV.com's Splash Page, GottaBeMobile.com, HomeIsPhones.com (whatever the hell those are), Movies.com (whose article is really about the implications for future film adaptation but gives a rounded overview of the issues), UGO.com, InsidePulse.com, KaboomMagazine.com, EscapistMagazine.com, and The Onion's famous AVClub.com. USA Today and The Associated Press are also covering this as it unfolds. This is indicative of the changed attitudes toward comics in the wider world, but much more-so the changed attitudes toward the superhero genre.

And that's a very good thing to this pundit's mind.

~@JonGorga

P.S. ~ I really try to resist this kind of commentary but... in the real world not EVERYONE wears a high collar. Or any single unifying element of clothing. These characters were always presented as different people from different places coming together to form a loose union. Looks silly to me for now. Just sayin'.

The "Women of Marvel" Campaign, A (Hopefully Unbiased) Look Back

The "Women of Marvel" project wasn't exactly welcomed with open arms when it was announced a little over a year ago. More like with disdainfully crossed arms. Most people (including at least part of the writing team here at The Long and Shortbox Of It) saw it as simplistic, limited, and, worst of all, pandering.

The concept was simple, and there lay its success and its downfall: Showcase the women of Marvel Comics, both professional and fictional, over the months of 2o1o.

Do you see the problems here yet? Let's break this down:

To say: 'Look, there IS female point of view in mainstream American comics!! See!?' is great because people should be aware of it and (hopefully) feel positively about it; but equally and obviously awful because if it needs to be pointed out so loudly to see that it's there at all, something's very wrong.

To showcase something is to display something you are proud of. Like on a shelf. Like your collection of action figures. (No disrespect to people with a collection of action figures. Interactive sculpture! I dig it. I have a lot of them.) Showcasing the women of Marvel (@Marvel) sounds like parading something for show.

The fictional female characters of comics are important and great. Our real-world female artists are important and great. But in very different ways. Equating them is a horrendous, horrendous mistake. Let's be honest: The female superheroes of mainstream American comics are presented in a manner that can be easily connoted as sexist. Mind you, male characters are also essentially treated equally badly in most respects. If you have had this argument with someone before then you've heard all this, so I apologize and I will not go into detail, but MANY people have never stopped to consider this. [Note, that the cover of the "Women of Marvel" 2o11 calendar above literally presents the character's bodies as interchangeable... And two of the three figures wear skintight swim-suit-style jumpsuits. Probably nobody's fault. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, two of the figures that have been chopped-up in the image are both Ms. Marvel-- one in her current costume and the other in her previous one. Proof that no one was paying very close attention to anything there.]

In January of last year, I attended a panel at the Brooklyn Public Library titled "Brooklyn Women in Comics: 3 local comics artists" the three female comicsmiths speaking were: Jessica Abel (@jccabel), Gabrielle Bell (@luckygab) and Jillian Tamaki (@dirtbagg). It was moderated by PW The Beat's Calvin Reid (@calreid). After the panel, I put my foot in my mouth pretty bad. I asked the two remaining panelists: "Wouldn't you agree, as successful women, happily making your own comics, that the perception that the comics world is sexist is a construct of people's perceptions?" I was rightly shut down.

The gist of what Jessica Abel and Gabrielle Bell said to me was:
'Indie comics have accepted women creators, but pigeon-holed them into autobiographical work. Marvel and DC are like a mens' club with impenetrable walls.'

"Oh" was probably all I could say. Although, I then expressed gratitude for their honesty.

Comics, as a medium, is not sexist. No one's saying it is. I still do not believe the comics industry itself is sexist. But I have come to realize my naiveté in thinking there wasn't a large majority of sexist-minded people in comics. I am not sexist. I actually consider myself a feminist. I am however, and unfortunately, capable of sexist-minded perceptions as a result of ignorance. And you know what? I am a bit more educated about the professional ladies at Marvel Entertainment and the barriers some faced than I was a year ago. And there's two very clear reasons for that: The "Brooklyn Women in Comics" panel I attended and the "Women of Marvel" promotional campaign.

Three mini-series were launched as part of the campaign: "Heralds", "Girl Comics" and "Her-oes" (about which we had commentary right here on the Long and Shortbox Of It). Each to differing, but none to a wild, success. "Girl Comics" was 100% written, drawn, edited, lettered, and colored by women creators, a first in mainstream American comics to my knowledge. Almost certainly in superhero comics. Interviews with female creators who often work on Marvel's books were printed on a roughly month-to-month basis on single (or double) pages printed in many issues of that month's comics. Almost every single time the interviewer ended with the question: 'What would you recommend to young women interested in the American comics industry?' And almost every single interviewee ended with the answer: 'The same thing I'd recommend to anyone...' followed by a personal and useful piece of advice from the interviewee's point-of-view.

Writer Kelly Sue DeConnick's (@kellysue) interview was particularly interesting, important, and poignant [I, in fact, already quoted from it in our recent Quote of the Week post]. If we can get USA TODAY to take a look at women in comics, we're making progress in educating the larger public. And we got a handful of interviews with women creators and even if just the one was excellent, we're making progress in educating poor slobs like me. Here's her answer to the same question they all received:

"I'm afraid I'm of the mind that there is still a glass ceiling; but there is also an open door. At this point in my career that ceiling is not something I find myself bumping up against--no matter what your gender, you've got to earn your shot at the top floor and it's way too early for me. But I'd be lying if I said, you know, 'Chin up, gals! Those days are behind us!'

That said, my great-grandmother was a girl when women got the vote in this country. My great-grandmother passed away when I was in college. Look at the strides that were made just in her life-time! I think of my daughter and what's possible in her lifetime and I tear up a little. I would give those female fans and creators the same advice I hope to give my daughter: embrace your passions. Be authentically yourself. It's okay to be daunted; it's okay to be afraid--move forward anyway. If this is what excites you, if what you want to do is make comics, then make comics. If you want to make super hero comics, I think that's great. There is nothing inherently masculine about heroism. Let me be the one to give you permission to scratch that itch.

And when someone tells you that science fiction and action stories aren't for girls, or women aren't good comic creators because they're not as visually oriented as men, or you're, you know, pretty good for a girl--don't let it wound you. Let it be fuel for your fire."

Good advice for all of us.

~@JonGorga